Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico is facing scrutiny for comments made during a Texas legislature committee meeting suggesting that failure to affirm a child’s “gender identity” amounts to child abuse.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Texas Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico described refusing to affirm a child’s “gender identity”as “abusive” in 2019.
📺 DETAIL:During a committee meeting in the Texas legislature in 2019, Talarico described refusing to affirm a child’s gender identity as “abusive.”“Some of us I think really do consider this abusive behavior… an unwillingness to identify, acknowledge a child’s gender identity. We consider that abusive to the child,abusive and destructive,” said Talarico at the time. The comments were made during a discussion on HB 1910, a bill aimed at ensuring that parental refusal to affirm a supposedly transgender child’s gender identity would not be considered child abuse in custody cases. Talarico opposedthe measure, insisting that failure to consider it abusive could “harm some of our most vulnerable kids.” While the bill failed at the committee stage, a stronger bill ultimately became law in 2025. Talarico also opposed this bill and supported an amendment stating that “rejecting a child’s gender identity or sexual orientation is abuse.”
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Only perverts and pedophiles think about what is in little kids’ pants as much as James Talafreako. He is a truly sick individual for dedicating his life to pushing sex changes on other people’s kids,” said Zach Kraft, a Republican National Committee (RNC) spokesman.
🎯 IMPACT: The resurfaced remarks are likely to create problems for Talarico as he contests a conservative state. Currently, the Senate race between Talarico and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is practically neck-and-neck.
📺 FLASHBACK: This revelation comes roughly a week after it was revealed that Talarico, who claims to be a Christian, described Islam and certain other religions as “equal pathways to truth” in a resurfaced video.
James talarico voted for legislation LAST YEAR to make parents who do not affirm their child's gender identity guilty of childabuse.
"some of us, I think, really do consider this abusive behavior … an unwillingness to identify, or, to acknowledge a child's gender identity, we… pic.twitter.com/XebhZtpDm5
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico is facing scrutiny for comments made during a Texas legislature committee meeting suggesting that failure to affirm a child's "gender identity" amounts to child abuse.
President Donald J. Trump announced an agreement between Russia and Ukraine to stop targeting energy infrastructure, amid global energy price concerns.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:President Donald J. Trumpsaid Monday that Russia and Ukraine have both agreed to halt strikes against each other’s energyinfrastructure, as conflicts around the world continue to put pressure on global energy markets.
📺 DETAIL: The announcement came as the 10-year Treasury yield reached five percent for the first time since 2007 andBrent crude climbed to $110 per barrel. The agreement follows months of increasingly intense missile and drone attacks. Russia launched 28 ballistic and hypersonic missiles and 115 dronesin just one overnight barrage against Kiev in August, killing at least 17 people and injuring 44 others. Ukraine has also expanded its long-range strike capabilities, including attacks against Russian infrastructure and oil facilities, with the conflict increasingly extending beyond the front lines. The energy situation has been compounded by fighting in the Middle East, where Iran-backed Houthi forces recently struck Saudi oil facilities and utilities, causing fires, operational shutdowns, and more than 70 injuries.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Ukraine has agreed not to hit Russian Energy targets. Russia has agreed to do, likewise! The World’s Diesel price rise is mostly caused by the Russia/Ukraine War, not Iran.” – President Donald J. Trump, Truth Social
🎯 IMPACT: Trump’s announcement could mark a significant step toward reducing attacks on energy infrastructure in the Russia-Ukraine war, potentially easing pressure on already volatile global fuel markets. If both sides honor the agreement, it could also create an opening for broader negotiations by establishing a limited area of cooperation despite continued missile and drone strikes.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
President Donald J. Trump announced an agreement between Russia and Ukraine to stop targeting energy infrastructure, amid global energy price concerns.
Donald Trump loved Britain. His mum was Scottish. He loved the Queen. He likes the King. And he’s mates with Nigel Farage.
But lately, Trump has turned on Britain. And while I obviously take umbrage with the emerging stances on the Falklands and the union, I also understand how he feels let down by a place he once regarded as his proud ancestral home.
Successive Tory and Labour governments have wrought economic, geopolitical, and demographic carnage on the United Kingdom. As I warned would happen at the time, slippery eel Boris Johnson was too busy with Ukraine and Net Zero to care about anything domestic besides locking people down during COVID. Keir Starmer and Andy Burnham have doubled down on his failed philosophy, adding a humiliating Chagos Islands deal and snubbing Trump’s requests for help against the Islamic Republic of Iran – a conflict I warned against, but that has clearly become the straw that broke the back of the “special relationship.”
“Your country’s in trouble. You’re on the edge of disaster,” Trump said recently. The recurring themes are immigration and energy policy. “You can be a wealthy country or a bankrupt country. You have your choice,” he said in early August.
“Two things are killing Europe. Number one is immigration. Number two is energy.”
– President Donald J. Trump, August 2026.
Net migration, while currently falling, has been wildly out of control for nearly two decades. And don’t let the establishment statisticians fudge the numbers, either. In the year to December 2025, gross 813,000 people immigrated to Britain on a long-term basis. That’s more than the population of a city the size of Leeds – the third largest city in the country. From an infrastructure perspective, it’s impossible. From a cultural, demographic, and religious standpoint, it’s a disaster.
Then there’s energy.
Britain sits next to one of the great energy basins of the developed world and has nevertheless spent years making domestic oil and gas increasingly unattractive to exploit. The headline tax rate on North Sea oil and gas profits reached 78 per cent. Meanwhile, British businesses have been wrestling with some of the developed world’s most expensive electricity.
Trump looks at that and thinks we’re bloody morons. And it’s really, really hard to blame him for thinking that.
Now look at our defence situation.
Britain is a nuclear power, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a founding member of NATO and historically one of the greatest military powers on earth. But real defence spending was allowed to fall 22 per cent between 2009/10 and 2016/17.
Today, the regular British Army numbers just 73,660 personnel, only 66,730 of whom are trade-trained. And while defence spending is back in the headlines and rising slowly, we spent decades collecting a peace dividend and then acted surprised when the world became dangerous again.
It’s also important to consider future technologies like AI and crypto, the latter of which has become a dirty word in Britain, but represents a global £2 trillion industry that we’ve fallen far, far behind on.
Around 12 per cent of British adults now own, or have owned, crypto — up from just four per cent in 2021. We should have been the natural European home of the industry: London already had the financial markets, the lawyers, the capital, the fintech ecosystem, and the timezone.
Instead, our governments have spent years arguing about how to regulate it to death, conflating it with money laundering and Russia hoaxes, instead of seizing the moment. This is such an anti-British mentality it flies in the face of how Britain ever became wealthy in the first instance: speed, ruthlessness, and smarts.
America decided it wanted to compete aggressively for the industry. And it is reaping the rewards. Anyone been to Miami recently? I have. It’s a boomtown like we’ve never seen before. A mega city whose wealth is outgrowing even its capacity to build. Mostly because of people fleeing an oppressive socialism in New York, and investing in emerging technologies and the blockchain.
Britain is still acting like a country managing its decline, rather than one interested in becoming richer and more powerful. So why on Earth should a bullish America feel the need to pander to us, anymore? Is the new world supposed to drag us kicking and screaming into the 21st century purely out of nostalgia? Or is Trump right to tell us to buck our ideas up or get left behind. It’s probably the latter, even though many bridle at the mere suggestion.
The OECD says British labour productivity actually FELL 0.7 per cent in 2024. In America it GREW 2.2 per cent.
The OECD expects the British economy to grow just 0.9 per cent this year and specifically identifies weak productivity and high and volatile energy prices among the problems holding us back.
But none of this is really about Trump himself. He’s merely the rather loud man standing outside looking in.
Nor is much of this the fault of the British public, though I will remind those of you who continue to vote Labour and Tory that you’re getting what you voted for. And it’s awful.
Britain’s uniparty inherited one of the richest, most innovative, most powerful countries in human history. A country with oil, gas, world-class universities, global financial markets, nuclear weapons, extraordinary scientific talent, and one of the best geographical positions on earth.
Somehow, they have managed to make Britain expensive to build in, expensive to manufacture in, expensive to employ people in, difficult to invest in, difficult to defend, and increasingly unattractive to its own most productive citizens. Look at the rates of people fleeing. Net migration among British nationals alone was minus 136,000 last year. I’ve long been one of them. Can you blame us?
On too many measures, countries we once patronisingly called “developing” are now moving faster than us.
When Donald Trump looks at what our political class has done to Britain and concludes that the people running the place are bloody morons, well that is almost impossible to argue with, and no national nostalgia or international Trump Derangement Syndrome can fault him.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Donald Trump loved Britain. His mum was Scottish. He loved the Queen. He likes the King. And he’s mates with Nigel Farage.
show more
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has achieved a significant breakthrough in Lower Saxony, tripling its vote share, while support for Germany’s two main establishment parties hit historic lows.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has tripled its vote share in Lower Saxony’s state elections.
📺 DETAIL: On Monday, it was reported that the AfD’s vote share in the region jumped from 4.6 percent in 2021 to 15.9 percent.The party finished in third place. Meanwhile, Germany’s two main establishment parties, Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD), recorded their worst-ever results in the region,with both losing significant support. The CDU came in first with 27 percent of the vote,a decline of roughly five percentage points from the previous election. This follows the AfD’s historic victory in the eastern Saxony-Anhalt region. There, the party secured 44 percent of the vote in its first-ever statewide victory.“It is the most severe election defeat the CDU has suffered in years, indeed in decades,” Chancellor Merz said of the results at the time. In contrast, President Donald J. Trump welcomed the result. “Wow! The Populist Party in Germany just had a really big night…THEY ARE ON THE RISE,and not going to take it anymore! MGGA!!!” the President posted on Truth Social.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “Given the coalition’s dismal state, new [federal] elections would be the cleanest solution from our perspective… The people must now decidewho should lead the country out of this crisis.” – Alice Weidel, AfD Leader.
🎯 IMPACT: The results represent significant progress for the AfD in Germany’s western regions, especially since the party’s base of support is mostly concentrated in the east. The results have intensified calls for a snap federal election, with AfD leaders arguing that the current government coalition is failing to address Germany’s challenges. This strong showing from the AfD in an area beyond its traditional strongholds is likely to spark further callsfrom within the German political establishment to ban the insurgent populist party. “Not with the politically predetermined goal that you now have to examine a ban, but to examine this party and the possible legal consequences. That could be a ban, but it could also be something else,” said Hendrik Wüst, Premier (Governor) of North Rhine-Westphalia for the CDU last week.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has achieved a significant breakthrough in Lower Saxony, tripling its vote share, while support for Germany's two main establishment parties hit historic lows.
Homeland Security Investigations is probing allegations that Rep. Ilhan Omar married her brother to facilitate immigrationfraud.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) is investigating immigration allegations involving Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), White House border czar Tom Homan confirmed Sunday. Homan said investigators are examining possible immigration violations or marriage fraud and stressed that members of Congress are not above the law.
📺 DETAIL: Homan confirmed that ICE is looking into allegations concerning Omar’s immigration history and her 2009 marriage to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin recently stated that Omar married her brother to help him enter the United States, but Homan did not confirm that allegation or disclose what evidence investigators may have. Omar, who was born in Somalia and arrived in the United States as a refugee in 1995, became a U.S. citizen in 2000. She has repeatedly denied allegations that Elmi is her brother or that she committed marriage or immigration fraud. Homan also said denaturalization is possible when the government proves that someone obtained citizenship through fraud or misrepresentation, but he did not confirm whether officials are pursuing that process against Omar. The comments follow earlier statements from Vice President JD Vance that the Justice Department was examining allegations of immigration fraud involving the Minnesota Democrat.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “If someone committed [an] immigration violation and someone committed marriage fraud… no one’s above the law.” – Tom Homan
🎯 IMPACT: The investigation could have significant political and legal implications for Rep. Ilhan Omar if federal authorities substantiate allegations of immigration or marriage fraud, potentially raising questions about her eligibility to remain a naturalized citizen.
New York City and state officials are challenging the Trump administration’s expansion of the “public charge” rule restricting green cards and visas for foreign nationals likely to be a drain on the welfare system, arguing it creates fear among immigrants.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) and Attorney General Letitia James (D) have filed lawsuits against the Trump administration’s expansion of the “public charge” rule, which could deny visas or green cards to immigrants likely to use public benefits. The lawsuits argue that the rule change creates fear among immigrants and discourages them from accessing legally entitled public services.
📺 DETAIL: The Trump administration’s expanded rule, set to take effect on September 18, broadens the list of benefits that could disqualify immigrants from obtaining visas or green cards. Mamdani, a Ugandan Muslim immigrant who only received U.S. citizenship in 2018, claims the policy could force up to four million foreign nationals to unenroll from healthcare out of fear it might affect their immigration status. The lawsuit is backed by several major cities and counties. A second lawsuit backed by a coalition of 21 states and Washington, D.C., is being filed under the leadership of James, who argues the rule undermines immigrants’ access to taxpayer-funded services.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “This rule preys on that fear and counts on families forfeiting the food assistance, health care coverage, and other public benefits to which they are legally entitled.” – New York Attorney General Letitia James
🎯 IMPACT: If the rule goes into effect, it could disincentivize many immigrants who are a net drain on the public finances from attempting to remain in the United States, or at least encourage them to stop claiming welfare. The Democrat-led legal challenges aim to block the policybefore it can take effect, allowing immigrants who tend to vote Democratic once naturalized to continue receiving benefits funded by U.S. taxpayers.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
New York City and state officials are challenging the Trump administration's expansion of the "public charge" rule restricting green cards and visas for foreign nationals likely to be a drain on the welfare system, arguing it creates fear among immigrants.
A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against new USPS rules on mail-in ballots, citing supposed risks of voter disenfranchisement ahead of upcoming elections.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: A federal judge has blocked the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from implementing new rules backed by President Donald J. Trump that would introduce extra safeguards for mail-in voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols issued a preliminary injunction Sunday, claiming that the rules could increase the risk that otherwise valid mail ballots would not be counted.
📺 DETAIL: The ruling follows a similar decision by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston. The Supreme Court is considering an appeal from the Trump administration following that ruling. The new Postal Service rules require ballot-envelope designs to receive federal approval and require states to upload voter information to a new USPS portal. The regulations also establish a verification process under which USPS could reject ballots that do not comply with the new requirements, to safeguard against voter impersonation and other forms of electoral fraud. Nichols had previously declined to block Trump’s executive order because the lawsuit was filed before the administration issued formal regulations. Plaintiffs renewed their challenge after USPS finalized the rule in August. The Supreme Court is now positioned to play a central role in determining whether the restrictions can take effect before the November midterms.
🎯 IMPACT: The ruling represents another legal obstacle to the Trump administration’s effort to improve election integrity before the midterms. With two federal judges now blocking the new Postal Service rules and the Supreme Court considering the dispute, the outcome will have broader implications for the federal government’s ability to safeguard federal elections.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against new USPS rules on mail-in ballots, citing supposed risks of voter disenfranchisement ahead of upcoming elections.
Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has secured a combined £72 million (~$72 million) in donations after British cryptocurrency entrepreneur Christopher Harborne matched a historic £36 million (~$48.7 million) donation from Ben Delo last week.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has received another record-breaking £36 million (~$48.7 million) donation.
📺 DETAIL: On Saturday, it was revealed that Christopher Harborne, a British cryptocurrency entrepreneur, had donated £36 million to the party, matching a donation made by another British cryptocurrency entrepreneur, Ben Delo, shortly before. Harborne has donated to Reform in the past, including a record-breaking £9 million (~$12.1 million) donationand a £5 million (~$6.7 million) giftto cover Farage’s personal security costs. The latter contribution has become the subject of a weaponized probe against Farage, culminating in the Reform leader’s decision to resign from Parliament in protest in order to contest a by-election (special election), which he comfortably won, demonstrating local voters’ continued support for him. “Reform is effectively a start-up party. And start-up parties don’t have the benefit of hundreds of years ofpatronage, which has createddeep rootswithin our communities and institutions. The established parties receive substantial public money and repeated donations and support through these deep roots,” wrote Harborne in an op-ed published over the weekend. Harborne clarified that he was not seeking a political position or specific policies in exchange for the donation. “A start-up party needs more money than can be provided by membership fees alone, to build and sustainitself and be ready for government. Whilst I have been making donations to Reform of around £1m a month, Ben Delo told me he was going to make a record donation of £36m. My competitive spiritinspired me to match it, so that is what I’ve done. And I hope others may join us,” Harborne explained.
🎯 IMPACT: The size of the donation is likely to trigger further attempts by the Labour Party-controlled government to cut off Reform’s financial backing, having already imposed a £100,000 (~$135,000)cap on party donations from British expatriates. The policy was widely regarded as an attempt to prevent Harborne and Delo, who were based in Thailand and Hong Kong, from donating to the party, although they have since relocated to Britain.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “I am honoured and humbled that Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne have shown such confidence in Reform. Both men know that we are the only party that can turn the country aroundand win the next General Election – thanks to their generosity, we are now able to fight that election on a level playing field.” – Nigel Farage, Reform UK leader.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Nigel Farage's Reform UK party has secured a combined £72 million (~$72 million) in donations after British cryptocurrency entrepreneur Christopher Harborne matched a historic £36 million (~$48.7 million) donation from Ben Delo last week.
Reform UK Member of Parliament (MP) Sarah Pochin shared the personal toll of the heightened security measures around her following the murder of Ann Widdecombe.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED:Reform UK MP Sarah Pochin has said her children have urged her to quit politics because they fear for her safety, as she revealed alleight of the party’s MPs now have round-the-clock security. Pochin said security measures were increased following the murder of Ann Widdecombe, who had served as a Reform immigration and justice spokeswoman before her death, allegedly at the hands of a left-wing extremist, in July.
📺 DETAIL: Pochin said the heightened protection had a major impact on her family life, with her sons, aged 25 and 27, becoming upset when security is discussed during visits. Pochin also described a recent vacation in north Wales where two security guards accompanied her and her husband at all times, saying the arrangements were “very, very intrusive.” She said she can no longer shop for clothes or cosmetics or even visit the supermarket alone because of the security risks, but vowed that she “will never be silenced.” Reform leader Nigel Farage, who has been subject to hundreds of death threats, previously raised concerns after his own security was reduced by the government.
💬 KEY QUOTE: “They’re like ‘Mum, please stop what you’re doing… it can never be worth risking your life.'” – Sarah Pochin, on her sons’ concerns
🎯 IMPACT: The comments highlight the growing security pressures facing Reform MPs and the personal toll that heightened protection can have on politicians and their families.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
Reform UK Member of Parliament (MP) Sarah Pochin shared the personal toll of the heightened security measures around her following the murder of Ann Widdecombe.
National Rally party leader Marine Le Pen has topped another poll for next year’s French presidential election, with establishment-backed candidates trailing.
PULSE POINTS
❓ WHAT HAPPENED: National Rally (RN) party leader Marine Le Pen is the favourite to win the next French presidential election,according to a new poll.
📺 DETAIL:According to a new poll by Toluna Harris Interactive, a digital market research agency, Le Pen is predicted to secure between 33 percent and 36 percentin the first round, putting her ahead of all her rivals. Significantly, the far-left Jean-Luc Mélenchon was predicted to reach the second round in three out of five scenarios, and to tie for second place with Édouard Philippe, an establishment “centrist” and former prime minister, in another first-round scenario. The poll was conducted between September 8 and September 10 and was reported on Monday. This follows another poll conducted by Toluna Harris published last month, which showed Le Pen beating Mélenchon (68 percent versus 32 percent), Philippe (55 percent versus 45 percent) and Gabriel Attal, another centrist former Prime Minister (57 percent versus 43 percent) in the second round. The poll also projected Le Pen winning 35 percent of the vote in the first round, well ahead of Mélenchon on 16 percent, Philippe on 14 percent, and Attal on eight percent.
🎯 IMPACT: These figures demonstrate that Le Pen is the clear favourite to win the French presidential election in 2027. If elected, it would be the first time in French history that the National Rally has won a presidential election. Even if polling suggests that he will lose to Le Pen,the fact that the far-left Mélenchon is predicted to reach the second round of voting in three out of five scenarios also shows that support for establishment candidates has waned significantly, while populist candidates on both the right and the left are gaining traction.
📺 FLASHBACK: Earlier this month, a poll conducted by Elabe put Le Pen on track to defeat Philippe (52.5 percentvs 47.5 percent) and Attal (57 percentvs 43 percent). The poll also showed Le Pen beating Mélenchon in the second round (69.5 percentvs 30.5 percent). The Institute for French Public Opinion (IFOP) also released a poll earlier this year which showed Le Pen ahead of all her major opponents, beating Attal (54 percent vs 46 percent), Philippe (55 percent vs 45 percent), and Mélenchon (70 percent vs 30 percent) in the second round. The poll also projected that Le Pen will secure 36 percent of the votein the first round.
Join Pulse+ to comment below, and receive exclusive e-mail analyses.
show less
National Rally party leader Marine Le Pen has topped another poll for next year's French presidential election, with establishment-backed candidates trailing.
show more
Share Story
FacebookTwitterWhatsappTruthTelegramGettrCopy Link
Real News Fan? Show It!
Many people are shocked to learn that because of active censorship, we currently have to spend more time making sure you can even see The National Pulse, than on producing the news itself. Which sucks. Because we do this for the truth, and for you.
But the regime doesn’t want you being informed. That’s why they want us to go away. And that will happen if more people don’t sign up to support our work. It’s basic supply and demand. So demand you get to read The National Pulse, unrestricted. Sign up, today.
We don’t sell ads, and refuse corporate or political cash. It all comes down to you, the reader. I hope you can help.